ColorMFA

A really small issue, but if my thinking is correct could be improved:

I think the calcultion of service intervals is referenced to internal calculated mileage, calculated from (corrected) speed and time.
It causes slight discrepance between on cluster shown milleage and service interval on long run (speed can be alligned to 1 % precision - it is more than enough for speed itself, but 1% on 15000 km is 150 km which is not neglible).
In few latest firmwares ColorMFA can show total mileage from cluster. If the service intervals could be referenced to this number we will have perfect alignement...

If my understanding how this works is not correct just let me know.

I've already thought about it. But when synchronized with the total mileage, there will be a discrepancy with the Trip2/3. Some people use Trip2 and Trip3 to calculate data between oil services.

I didnt thought about it
If the sinhronization of service interval could be selected between total mileage and internal calculated mileage it will be the best solution.
If it is not too complicated to realize of course...

Okay, I'll try.

I found an option in debug>sw>forcing: Sync Milleage.
Is this option about what is this topic ?

sg1 писал(а): ↑

18 фев 2022, 19:49

I found an option in debug>sw>forcing: Sync Milleage.
Is this option about what is this topic ?

I watched the exact same thing today and was going to ask

This is still a "raw" function. Completely untested.

P/S/: You were talking about 1%. The new tire is 8mm tread. An old tire has 4mm (or less) tread. This is already 1% difference. Different pressure in the wheels (winter/summer, tires is heated or not, etc.) is still a difference. So there is no exact measurement on these cars.

Thank you for an answer.
Anyway, I enabled this option yesterday and will see the effect.

Function as is now is unfortuantely unusable.
Traveled trip distance is not correct - showed distance is several times to low. As consequence average fuel consumption is several times to high. I disabled this option.

I said that the function is not ready yet.

I understand. I just hope that my feedback is useful.

Ok. Thanks.

sg1 писал(а): ↑

24 фев 2022, 14:02

Function as is now is unfortuantely unusable.
Traveled trip distance is not correct - showed distance is several times to low. As consequence average fuel consumption is several times to high. I disabled this option.

Same

Yes I understand.